There’s always been an air of desperation around right-wing attempts to smear Judge Merrick Garland’s judicial record. Unable to find actual evidence that Judge Garland is anything but a fair-minded jurist who upholds the rule of law, his critics have resorted to either gross mischaracterizations of his decisions, or attacks manufactured out of thin air—making assumptions about his views based on the bare fact that President Obama nominated him rather than actual cases (and he has 19 years’ worth to choose from).
The Nomination of Merrick Garland
Every day, federal judges protect the Constitution, place a check on overzealous legislatures, and help Americans find justice.
Demystifying and decoding advocacy by equipping organizations with knowledge and tools.
Over the past several decades, a conservative-led campaign has eviscerated the ability of Americans to have their day in court.
We fight to hold the court to the highest ethical standards, and we fight for a court that upholds the rights of everyday Americans.
In a series of speeches on the House floor last Thursday, a group of House Members led by Rep. Hank Johnson made a powerful and compelling case to end the insidious practice of pre-dispute forced arbitration. Attacking forced arbitration in all its forms, the Members explained how corporations use the practice to deceive individuals into giving up their legal rights and escape accountability for breaking the law. They also highlighted the growing demand for change and various ongoing reform efforts, including new legislation and agency rulemaking.
AFJ in the News
More than a dozen West Virginia University law professors joined in writing a letter to Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, urging her and her Republican colleagues in the Senate to vote on the president’s nomination to fill the U.S. Supreme Court vacancy.
Say the government used money paid to access court information to buy flat-screen monitors — would that violate federal law?
That’s the accusation in a lawsuit against the United States of America, that takes aim specifically at the U.S. Administrative Office and its Public Access to Court Records Electronic System, otherwise known as PACER.
Washington, D.C. April 21, 2016— Alliance for Justice, along with the National Veterans Legal Services Program and the National Consumer Law Center, has today filed a class action lawsuit in federal court accusing the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts of illegally charging excessive fees to access court records through its online Public Access to Court Electronic Records system (PACER).
MEDIA ADVISORY TELEPHONE PRESS AVAILABILITY April 13, 2016 Contact: Kyle Barry, Director of Justice Programs Alliance for Justice 202-464-7365, firstname.lastname@example.org Over 50 professors and constitutional experts from Ohio law schools have written a letter to Sen. Rob Portman urging him to “give fair consideration to the nomination of Chief Judge Merrick Garland to the Supreme… Read more »
Actor, activist, and union member Bradley Whitford narrates this powerful documentary about Supreme Court cases that threaten to undermine the rights of working Americans – and how we can fight back.