In this excerpt, Arizona Attorney General Thomas Horne has barely begun his argument when Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan question him concerning the meaning of “accept and use.” At its base, if Arizona’s position is accepted, states would be free to impose limitless burdens on top of the NVRA’s simple form, and render the Act – and its underlying purpose – meaningless. The questioning here points to the conflict between Proposition 200 and the NVRA.