Trump judges and nominees who have fought fairness, equality, and opportunity for Native Americans
Ryan Bounds (Nominated to Ninth Circuit; Withdrawn) served as opinion editor and assistant news editor for the Stanford Review. During his time there, The Stanford Review’s editorial page began a repeated segment called “Smoke Signals” which featured a crude caricature of a Native American. Stanford University President Gerhard Casper and Provost Condoleezza Rice criticized The Stanford Review’s use of the image and approximately a dozen Native American students wrote letters of complaint.
Brett Kavanaugh (Supreme Court), while on the D.C. Circuit, exhibited a lack of understanding of tribal rights and Native American history in past writings on the topic. He wrote an amicus brief supporting a challenge to the Hawaiian Constitution, which Native rights activists argue misclassified tribes as racial minorities instead of sovereign nations protected by the Constitution.
Kenneth Lee (Ninth Circuit), in his twenties, mocked the “politically correct clique” for criticizing professional sports teams that use offensive Native American caricatures and stereotypes in their mascots and cheers.
Robert Luck (Eleventh Circuit) as a state court judge criticized the longstanding doctrine of tribal immunity.
Steven Menashi (Second Circuit), while in college, defended the Dartmouth College football cheer, “Wah-Hoo-Wah! Scalp ‘Em,” and dismissed the idea that it proceeded “from a racist belief in the inferiority of American Indians.”
Eric Miller (Ninth Circuit) has a lengthy and disturbing record on Native issues, leading to opposition to his nomination from the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) and the Native American Rights Fund (NARF). This is one of only a small handful of times in NCAI’s history that they have formally opposed a judicial nomination.
Michael Park (Second Circuit) worked on two briefs in Sturgeon v. Frost, advocating for a position that could lead to the elimination of federal protection of subsistence fishing rights for Alaska Natives.
Patrick Wyrick (Western District of Oklahoma) served as lead counsel and negotiator for the Oklahoma Attorney General’s Office in a five-year dispute over water rights with two of Oklahoma’s largest Indian tribes – the Chickasaw Nation and Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma. Wyrick has also fought tribal sovereignty in amicus briefs and Supreme Court petitions on behalf of Oklahoma, including opposing tribal immunity from suits brought by states in Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community and Oklahoma v. Hobia; and arguing against tribal court jurisdiction to adjudicate certain claims against nonmembers in Dollar Gen. Corp. v. Miss. Band of Choctaw Indians.